ads-c

a-ads

Our Ads


 PILIH KATEGORI  


Laporan Parlemen Eropa Tentang Cryptocurrency Dan Bank Sentral


Cryptocurrency di Parlemen Eropa. Beberapa hari lalu, Parlemen Eropa merilis laporan tentang cryptocurrency dan keterkaitannya dengan tantangan yang harus dihadapi oleh bank sentral. Laporan itu disusun sesuai permintaan dari Komite Parlemen Eropa Urusan Ekonomi dan Moneter.

Dalam laporan yang terdiri dari 33 halaman penuh itu, berisikan tentang analisis mata uang berbasis kripto (cryptocurrency), berkaitan dengan dampaknya terhadap pasar keuangan dan kebijakan moneter, terutama dengan bagaimana peran bank sentral yang seharusnya memonopoli penerbitan uang.

Meski pihak regulator dan juga bank sentral menghadapi dampak yang ditimbulkan, namun mata uang kripto juga menghadapi persoalan yang sama. Dalam laporan itu dituliskan, “Mata uang kripto menghadapi tantangan untuk bisa merebut pasar, dan berupaya untuk bisa mendapat pengakuan pemerintah sebagai alat pembayaran, membangun kepercayaan publik mengenai stabilitasnya, dan mencapai jaringan yang memadai dalam penggunannya. Meski pemerintah dan bank sentral tidak menerima sebagai entitas resmi di masing-masing yurisdiksi, namun masalah pengakuan pasar tetap terbuka, dan ekspansi cepat Bitcoin dan proyek mata uang kripto lain di seluruh dunia menunjukkan hal itu mungkin terjadi. Penerbit mata uang pribadi dan kontemporer mampu memastikan jaringan globalnya secara transparan dalam hal sirkulasi, algoritma yang kredibel saat menciptakan mata uang kripto, dan mekanisme transaksi yang relatif aman, cepat, dan murah.”

Secara keseluruhan, pada laporan parlemen eropa tersebut memang banyak membicarakan tentang kelebihan dan kekurangan mata uang kripto. Dalam laporan tersebut juga memprediksi bahwa mata uang kripto tidak mungkin bisa berkompetisi terhadap kuasa monopoli uang bank sentral dalam waktu dekat.

Meski demikian, mata uang kripto dengan karekteristik khasnya yang berkaitan dengan perkembangan teknologi termasuk dalam hal transparansi jaringan dan potensi transaksi yang lintas batas, mata uang kripto mempunyai peluang survive yang lebih baik. Era digital dianggap mempu mengatasi banyak kekurangan-kekurangan mata uang saat ini.

Sementara itu, berkaitan dengan sikap para pemangku kebijakan, sebagian besar lebih banyak memilih untuk bersikap “wait and see” saja. Di dalam laporan itu, lebih menyarankan untuk sebaiknya mengambil titik tengah antara sikap yang optimis dan suka cita.

Landasan atas hal itu adalah karena dengan karakter mata uang kripto yang bisa ditransaksikan lintas batas negara, maka peraturan yang bisa diselaraskan di seluruh yurisdiksi akan mampu memungut pajak. Penarikan pajak itu dapat disamakan seperti halnya investasi dalam aset keuangan lain@BPI

Binance and SYS Respond to Irregular Trading


Binance and Sys Irregular Trading. Binance’s trading suspension lifted as more details emerge about July 3rd incident. After Binance’s internal risk management system detected irregular trades from a number of API users, on July the 3rd, it temporarily suspended trading, withdrawals and other account functions.

The irregularity came from an issue with Binance's API, which caused exponential volume and market pressure to Syscoin trading. There was a sharp spike in the price of SYS and buy/sell order prices hit remarkable levels.


Sudden jump in value of SYS


Binance has stated that to “protect the safety of our API users” it has taken a number of actions relating to the incident. Primary amongst was a rollback of irregular trades and the removal of all existing API keys — with a request for all Binance API users to recreate their API keys.

In addition, Binance has warned API users to better safeguard their API keys going forward and to use the IP whitelist functionality to ensure keys are only accessible to authorized users.

“No coins were mined outside of the regular mining schedule, and the Syscoin blockchain was not compromised.” — Syscoin co-founder Sébastien DiMichele


For its part, Syscoin co-founder Sébastien DiMichele says there was no breach of the Syscoin network and the incident was purely API related. He says the Syscoin block explorer “indicated that 1.2 billion coins were transferred back and forth on the same block (block #87670), and [it] was not an attack on the network”.

DiMichele adds that “no coins were mined outside of the regular mining schedule, and the Syscoin blockchain was not compromised.”

Syscoin secures its blockchain using ZDAG technology, additionally, it is merge mined with Bitcoin, giving it a boost in hash rate and creating greater security against hackers.

Binance has provided a summation of the incident on its support site. In addition to the noted action relating to API usage, Binance is offering rebates and compensation to users affected by the outage and announced the creation of a Secure Asset Fund for Users (SAFU). Binance says beginning on the 14th of July it “will allocate 10% of all trading fees received into SAFU to offer protection to our users and their funds in extreme cases. This fund will be stored in a separate cold wallet.”@BPI

Bitcoin Gold Introduces Algorithm To Counter ASIC Centralization


Bitcoin Gold Introduces Algorithm. Bitcoin Gold, one of the most prominent Bitcoin forked cryptocurrencies, has just migrated to a new mining algorithm, to ensure that ASIC-resistance is maintained.

Bitcoin Gold Hard Fork At Block 536,200


Bitcoin Gold was founded with the decentralization of mining in mind, adopting algorithms which ASICs cannot mine on. Many critics of ASIC mining machines see these specialized pieces of hardware as a source of centralization, as ASICs can be bought en-masse, putting a copious amount of relatively affordable hash power into the hands of a single entity. 

A group of individuals thought it best to build off of this criticism, forking off the main ASIC-infested Bitcoin blockchain into Bitcoin Gold in October 2017. BTG first enlisted the use of the Equihash algorithm, which was ASIC-resistant at the time. In the nine months since then, new Equihash ASICs have begun to edge out GPU miners, with these specialized machines offering an exponentially higher dollar/hash ratio.

On Tuesday, the Bitcoin Gold team announced that it had successfully implemented a network upgrade by initiating a hard fork on the 536,200 BTG block. The release from the Bitcoin Gold team member, Edward Iskra, noted that the upgrade changed the mining algorithm for BTG. With the algorithm changing from Equihash to an updated version of the aforementioned algorithm, fittingly named Equihash-BTG.

This upgrade is an attempt to keep ASICs away from the network, introducing a layer of ASIC-resistance that should stave off any attempts at centralizing BTG mining. Although successful so far, it is likely that ASIC manufacturers may pick up on the new Equihash-BTG algorithms moving into the future.  

The May BTG 51% Attack


Bitcoin Gold experienced a 51% attack in May, amongst growing fears of similar attacks on other blockchains. The double-spend attack saw $18 million worth of BTG being exploited by the malicious attackers, getting a nice payday from the attack.

According to analysis from the cryptocurrency community and BTG team, the 51% attack was a result of rented hash power, which may have consisted of ASIC miners. The new algorithm ensures that there is no rental market for Equihash-BTG miners, making the upgraded blockchain more secure.

Edward Iskra wrote:

The recent “51%” attacks, which may or may not have involved ASIC miners, were channeled through hashpower rental markets – but with this change in algorithm, there’s no longer a rental market for the algorithm we’re using, and it’s harder to set one up than before. This means more safety.

Additionally, this hard fork also introduces a new difficulty adjustment system, ensuring that the BTG blockchain is responsive to large hash power shifts.

LWMA, the improved difficulty adjustment algorithms, allows for the better stabilization of block times, assuring that a new block gets pushed out approximately every 10 minutes after a hashrate swing. Iskra chalked up this change to the auto-switching method which miners enlist to receive the most mining profits.

The release stated:

Our improved algorithm will help the blockchain adjust more quickly, providing a steadier flow of blocks.

Rising Bitmain Power On New Algorithms

Bitmain is one of the most influential companies in the cryptocurrency space, reportedly generating over $3 billion in profits in 2017 alone. The ASIC manufacturer historically built ASICs for the SHA-256 and Scrypt algorithms, or for Bitcoin and Litecoin respectively. However, Bitmain has recently started creating new ASICs for algorithms that were previously ASIC-resistant, algorithms like Equihash and EthHash. 

These news ASICs have begun to affect Equihash and EthHash blockchains, such as ZCash and Ethereum. GPU miners who contribute hash power to these blockchains have been seeing declining profits, with ASICs easily outperforming graphics card rigs.

Ethereum and ZCash have abstained from forking away from ASICs, leading to an environment where GPU miners have had to bow out of mining pools. This will only help Bitmain hold its monopoly on the cryptocurrency mining industry, which lacks competitors to this ever-growing ASIC giant@BPI

NEO Decentralization Begins with Election of City of Zion Consensus Node


NEO Decentralization Begins. The decentralization of the NEO network has begun with the election of a City of Zion consensus node onto the NEO MainNet. City of Zion is a global, independent group of open source developers, designers and translators formed to support the NEO core and ecosystem.

The City of Zion consensus node has been running smoothly on the NEO TestNet for six months in preparation for election. Several other independent consensus nodes are also running on the TestNet and are planned to be voted in by the end of 2018.

These independent nodes include one hosted by KPN, one of the the largest telecom companies in the Netherlands. KPN announced its intention to host a consensus node at the first NEO meet up in Amsterdam on January 13th. KPN has 6.3 million fixed-line telephone customers; more than 33 million mobile subscribers in the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, France, and Spain; and provides internet access to 2.1 million customers throughout Western Europe.

Fenbushi Capital is another company currently running a consensus node on the NEO TestNet in line for election. Fenbushi Capital was established in 2015 and was named one of the top 5 blockchain venture capital firms by CB Insights. The VC firm is said to have invested over USD $50 million in blockchain projects, and has Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, as an advisor.

The KPN and Fenbushi Capital consensus nodes have been running on the NEO TestNet since April, 2018.

NEO has taken a methodical approach to decentralization, with founder Da Hongfei often acknowledging NEO’s centralized state. However, the gradual roll out of decentralization has been an intentional strategy, allowing the core development team to perform faster upgrades to the network.

Hongfei commented on this approach during his interview with Tyler Swope on NEOTALK @ DevCon: “We have to be very careful with decentralization of the consensus nodes, because the protocol of NEO is evolving very fast. We need those consensus nodes to act very quickly to upgrade, and if there is a bug or a security issue, we need them to respond very quickly. So we’re doing the decentralisation process slowly, gradually and very carefully.”

City of Zion also published an article in December of 2017 on “coopetition”, which is a philosophy where organizations who would otherwise be competitors cooperate in a shared project. This is an approach taken by many industrial open source and energy consortiums.

The article points out that in traditional Proof-of-Work or Proof-of-Stake networks, through the implementation of economic incentives and a range of second order off-chain interactions, such as access to cheap energy, ASICs or GPUs, on-chain oligopolies can be formed. Bitmain and its early access to ASIC technology is cited as one example of such an occurrence.

As there are no economic rewards for running a NEO consensus node, the onlyincentive is to ensure the integrity of the network. Therefore, it is in the best interest of organizations building and relying upon the NEO blockchain to deploy and maintain healthy nodes.

City of Zion explains: “In line with these ideas, NEO will begin its decentralization by allowing well known commercial projects and communities to run consensus nodes, forming an initial confederation of actors with a strong interest in guaranteeing the security and success of the network. While it might seem counterintuitive, this architecture will be less centralized than many other networks today. Through coopetition, we can ensure that all players are equal in the network by design. Their power won’t depend on how much money they have, or how cheap their electricity may be.”

In today’s announcement by NEO, a timeline of the decentralization process was laid out, beginning with the launch of the TestNet in 2015. The timeline states that NEO plans to open the network for public campaign and election of consensus nodes by 2019. A webpage for monitoring NEO blockchain status and information on consensus node candidates and their votes has been made available at:https://neo.org/consensus

All nominees for consensus nodes will be required to go through an identification process before they are voted in on MainNet, and will need to provide contact availability to ensure that time-critical events can be handled if they arise. Parties that prove that they can maintain outstanding uptime on the NEO TestNet will be eligible to be voted in as a MainNet consensus node by NEO holders@BPI

Optical Proof of Work (PoWx) - Alternative POW With Optical Computing


Alternative POW With Optical Computing. A conducive mining climate, still decentralized, has been the backstop for the success and security of bitcoin. Over time and development, the developmental climate also has the potential to become centralized because of the strength of large capital or a certain group that successfully has the amount of mining computing close to 50%.

Background


Strength of capital or the group has the potential to master the mining ecosystem by enlarging the amount of computing power (hashrate) bitcoin network. In this case, the group, or the power of large capital is the greatest influence comes from the producers of bitcoin mining devices that are now dominated by ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuits).

ASIC mining equipment dominates the bitcoin mining ecosystem because of its efficiency and effectiveness in performing certain computations for bitcoin mining compared to the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit).

Monopoly Hashrate and ASIC Devices


One of the big ASIC vendors, Bitmain, later became a party that monopolized many mining ecosystems through its manufacturer ASIC device. In the bitcoin network, Bitmain also has a hashrate approaching 50%.

The condition is of course a worrying condition, related to the potential mastery of the network that could happen at any time, including the potential of 51% attack. However, basically, ASIC vendor dynamic conditions are not a problem if more and more ASIC vendor alternatives are emerging. So ASIC producer climate becomes more competitive and also conducive.

Unfortunately, gradually since they were founded, BItmain itself has positioned itself as an ASIC producer that has increasingly monopolized the market. Allegedly, the number of devices used alone far greater than the number of ASIC sold in the market.

Bitmain with the device has enough potential to make bitcoin network become centralized. Bitmain itself is widely dismissed allegations that BTC.com independent, but it is just empty pepesan only because it is fully owned by Bitmain.

ASIC AsicBoost Asylum


AsicBoost, is an ASIC device for mining embedded in a new way to allow the exploit of its devices to maximize performance up to 20% faster, then embedded on its ASIC chip.

The potential weakness of the algorithm in POW bitcoin consensus was first recognized by Grex Maxwell and posted into the bitcoin developer mailing list forum on April 5, 2017. The potential that was then known, there are some miners who use unfair ways against other miners in bitcoin networks.

The unfair efforts use ways that are considered to be detrimental to other miners. The Asicboost utilizes the hash merkle damgard function, which in bitcoin mining processes typically hashing block headers with 80 bytes that focus on nonce with 32 bit size.

If in any SHA256 hashing process exclusively using 64 bits in the first option, then the effect of the previous data will also not be affected. Whereas if there is a miner capable of making the first 64 bit header block and the second block with a closer distance or identical to 16 bits only, then the miner can use the calculation and repeated for some experiment in the next block. As a result, the method can effectively reduce energy consumption and power, so it can work up to 20% more effective.

The attack using ASIC device media called Asicboost was initially patented by Timo Hanke and Sergio Demian Lerner in November 2014. The controversy about Asicboost continued when Bitmain's party attempted to patent their Asicboost version without entirely listing Timo Hanke and Sergio Demian credits Lerner. The Asicboost patent is listed in China on behalf of Bitmain.

Again, the cautious effort was re-done by Bitmain to re-try to control the network through the amount of computing device ASIC. It was then parried with Segwit bitcoin activation, which made Asicboost unable to function. The cornerstone of Segwit Activation is then rejected by the Bitmain CS plot, and raises BCash (Bitcoin Cash).

Instead of disagreeing with Segwit, Bitmain CS proposed Segwit2x that actually allowed their Asicboost to function and gain a much greater profit. When Segwit bitcoin is active and successful, then again Bitmain CS tries to find another way by bringing up a new drama on behalf of BCash.

Overall, both the potential for mastery of bitcoin networks through major ASIC producers, and the potential of Asicboost has long been a thorn in meat in Bitcoin. However, bitcoin should be able to make the mining climate and the bitcoin network as a whole to remain decentralized, no control and control in it.

PoWx With Optical Computing in Proof of Work Bitcoin


Gradually, an option appears to change PoW bitcoin. Luke Dashjr, bitcoin developer, then repeatedly tried to dig his opinion on the bitcoin community about the option. Until soon PoWx took advantage of Optical Computing (Photonic Computing) to improve the security of Bitcoin PoW consensus.

So far this bitcoin PoW change option is still limited to the proposal only, and also still in the stage of further development. However, understanding the condition of the mining ecosystem and everything that covers it above becomes quite important to know if it turns out at some point later this option is used in Bitcoin.

Now public: one of the most promising options for a #Bitcoin PoW change, that Bitmain has no common experience, and eliminates the electricity-cost bias.

* Optical * proof-of-work (aka #PoWxfor some reason). https://t.co/6YlFtqqHuw

- Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) July 3, 2018


Then how the Optical Proof of Work (OPoW) is actually? OPoW basically focuses on the use of hardware and software based on Optical Computer / Optical Computing, or so-called (Photonic Computing). In this case, the devices in it are no longer dependent to use electric energy currents to be able to compute, but using visible or infrared (IR) light photons.

If generally the basic building of a modern computer is a transistor, then the transistor is then replaced with optical-based electronic components. So that the intensity of light can enter and transmitted through the material in the same way as the bipolar transistor response.

Because light is an important element, unlike electrical energy that has the potential to damage the device more heat if the computation is faster, culminate with the increasing amount of electricity used, and heat is the main factor of damage to the device. With light, then no matter how much is used, so the development of data processing and computing systems becomes more resistant and powerful. This computer-based optical technology, believed mempu process much faster than modern electronic computers today.

In general, the vision of optical computing OPoW based applications of PoWx has many benefits, including:

Beneficial to improve the decentralization of bitcoin mining ecosystems Minimize the rate of use of electrical energy power Addressing the potential problem of the centrality of mining ecosystems such as ASIC / GPUD projected to run on PoW Bitcoin. Creating a more competitive mining ecosystem climate, away from monopolies with open source development projects. alert to futureQuantum Computing challenges

The Problem of Using High Electrical Energy in Bitcoin Mining


One of the biggest problems in the mining ecosystem is the amount of electrical energy required to compute. So far, with the effectiveness of ASIC device performance is still not able to provide a solution to the amount of energy it.

If in some variants Altcoin many who use DPoS for mining mechanism, then Bitcoin must still try to become more expensive ecosystem so it can still be decentralized. This is what keeps the bitcoin different with some Altcoin variants.

Due to DPoS, it still allows a small group of potentially networking potentials. PoW bitcoin now, to be able to master the bitcoin network will require resources that really so big. Although the potential is still possible, but it will be quite difficult it can be done. While hardware for mining, OPoW will also use ASIC based Optics. In this case, the Application Specific Photonic Integrated Circuit (ASPIC) is used.

Crypto Regulation, Philippines Take a Different Approach


Philippine Crypto Regulation. Unlike the Thai government, the Philippine government chose to take a different approach on crypto regulation. Dated June 26, through the CEZA (Cagayan Economic Zone Authority), announced that there will be only 25 licenses to be issued by the government.

25 permits issued by the Philippine authority apply to the crypto market, Mining Farm, ICO, or any other crypto entity operating in that country. The move was taken as a precautionary measure to protect investors from potential fraud and scams.

While related to the requirements that must be met, crypto exchanges must have a minimum investment value of USD 1 million in a period of 2 years. Another requirement is to have an office in the Philippines, registered with the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission, and pay USD 100,000 for its permission. As compensation, the entity that pocketed the permit and complied with the requirements is entitled to a tax break from the Philippine government.

Commenting on Reuter, Raul Lambino of CEZA, "We will give 10 permits for crypto exchanges from Japan, Hongkong, Malaysia and Korea. They can be crypto mining, ICO, or crypto exchanges. Fiat money exchange to crypto or vice versa should be done overseas so as not to violate the regulations in the Philippines, "he explained.

Related to the prevention of fraud and scam, Lambino added, "Currently still in the process of formulating regulations that can provide protection of investment cryptocurrency," he said. In this case, CEZA acts as a hub associated with the investment of the world of financial technology.

Regulations to provide protection against potential fraud and scam are more emphasis on not allowing ponzi schemes. The potential is generally well known from the ICO project. Lambino himself considers the ICO project a lot of fraudsters. According to Lambino, there are many scammers that operate and are associated with crypto exchanges with capital and small market capitalization. "We do not want the Philippines to be a haven for fraudsters, as well as schemes of fraud originating from abroad", he stressed@BPI

Crypto Law in Thailand Without Rigor


Crypto Law in Thailand. If most countries are complicated enough to formulate crypto law, in Thailand the process is true without any lengthy debates. Generally, a long debate to formulate related crypto legislation on the assessment of whether crypto is categorized as securities or not.

Since last April, the Thai Government has also taken seriously to immediately regulate the market for crypto. By Thai finance minister, Apisak Tantivorawong at a cabinet meeting at that time, had already announced a crypto currency regulation plan.

As a result, the Thai government uses a crypto law that is. The cryptocurrency and digital tokens commonly referred to through the ICO program are viewed as a digital asset business. Not only that, the Thai Government is also ready to change their tax laws, in order to take revenue from new industries in the segment.

Thai government regulations, in detail regulate the rules of business related to the crypto world such as exchanges, brokers, as well as about ICO regulations (Initial Coin Offerings). Specifically about this ICO, later the ICO token must be paired with one of seven specified crypto currency. The seven crypto currencies are like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, Litecoin, Stellar, Bitcoin Cash, and Ripple.

With regard to its tax withdrawal, the Government will withdraw 15% as taxes taken from profits. More specifically, the tax for digital asset trading is subject to 7% for VAT in each trade.

VAT tax withdrawal in each crypto trade is then considered to be enough to inhibit new industries later to be able to grow. One of the law firms that has clients from the crypto industry, Baker McKenzie rate VAT should be eliminated. According to him, the tax-specific withdrawal rules for trade are the rest of the old tax rules.

Broadly speaking, the steps taken by the Thai Government on regulation of crypto currency is a bold step. But in connection with the regulation, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand is trying to be able to balance between the pros and cons Crypto.

In addition, if through the crypto law is too tight, it will cause new industry players will choose to run overseas. With these efforts, the Thai government has tried new opportunities to compete with other countries that project as a crypto center. Other countries such as Japan, South Korea, and also Taiwan@ BPI